Doing better on one repeated exercise is not enough. What matters is whether the underlying skill still holds up when the format changes.
What we claim, what we measure, what is still being tested.
This page sets out what IQMindware aims to improve, how we measure progress, what evidence we currently publish, and where the limits still are. Our goal is real life transfer beyond a single game or task, but we present that as something to test and track, not promise.
Need module-level assessment detail? See G Tracker validation.
What we mean by transfer
Transfer means your progress carries over when the task changes, not just when you repeat the same game.
We check this by changing the way the task looks or works, so we can see whether the improvement is real and flexible rather than tied to one familiar format.
We also measure progress before, after, and again later on, to see whether the improvement still appears beyond the immediate training session.
The public evidence surfaces
The page separates claim boundaries, current protocol documents, measure status, and data cadence so maturity and caveats are visible.
What IQMindware can say, what it cannot say, and which claim verbs are acceptable.
Current protocol drafts for readiness gating, progression, transfer, and validation.
What each outcome marker is for, its current status, and the caveat attached to it.
How aggregated summaries are updated, with no raw personal logs published.
What we can and cannot claim
The public proof posture uses disciplined verbs. Transfer is tested and tracked, not guaranteed.
- ✓Designed to train general intelligence capacity and cognitive resilience.
- ✓Aims to test carry-over under changed conditions.
- ✓We test transfer with wrapper swaps, boundary/trap probes, and delayed re-checks.
- ✓We track trends and publish aggregated summaries with caveats.
- ✕Proves far transfer.
- ✕Guaranteed far transfer or guaranteed outcomes.
- ✕Clinically proven language.
- ✕Increases IQ as a guaranteed or universal claim.
- ✕Diagnosis, treatment, or cure framing.
What we measure
Measures are not all treated as equally mature. Each has a status and a caveat.
Brief fluid reasoning snapshot.
A short baseline/post reasoning check for practical trend interpretation.
Caveat: brief form for tracking, not high-stakes diagnostic use.
Applied cognitive bandwidth.
Self-report marker for applied cognition patterns in daily contexts.
Caveat: validation remains in testing; interpret as a practical tracking signal.
Cognitive control capacity in bits/second.
Measured by the Multiple Function Task (masked), or MFT-m, as a behavioural throughput signal for route setting.
Caveat: practical readiness and dose signal, not an IQ score or diagnostic measure.
How each layer connects to far transfer
Each layer has a different proof job: route the session, vary the surface, increase reasoning demand, or measure whether progress carries beyond training.
Readiness gating and route adjustment so training dose matches state.
MFT-m Zone Check ProtocolAdaptive working-memory and attention training with wrapper swaps to reduce one-game dependence.
N-back Progression ProtocolRelation matching, constraint solving, and must-follow reasoning with meaning and surface swaps.
Reasoning Tasks Progression ProtocolPre/post and interval checks used to test whether progress carries beyond one training block.
Brief Reasoning Measure ValidationProtocol and theory documents
These are the current public protocol documents for readiness, progression, transfer, and validation, plus the deeper Trident G theory note behind the design.
Data summaries and publication cadence
Data publication is aggregated and caveated. Personal raw logs are not published.
What remains exploratory
The proof posture is deliberately bounded. Evidence status and caveats matter.