IQMindware Find my route

How IQ Mindware works

Cognitive support built around the activity system that matters.

Start with the task, workflow, pathway or learning process and the experience of the people inside it. Keep Capacity, Coupling, Niche and Mixed explanations alive, then test whether the best response is to develop capability, improve policy support, redesign the conditions or combine these approaches.

The CSI route

Define. Localise. Test. Reconnect.

The activity goal, participant evidence, intervention and outcome remain distinct so that support is not confused with diagnosis or local app improvement with real-world change.

Define the pressure point

Specify the activity, outcome, affected participants, protected constraints and the practical consequence of the current friction.

Activity first

Localise competing explanations

Compare capacity, policy–system coupling, environmental or institutional conditions and mixed hypotheses using operational, cognitive and participant evidence.

Evidence + confidence

Select a bounded test

Choose a low-risk, useful and preferably reversible Develop, Couple or Redesign intervention that can improve the outcome and discriminate among the leading explanations.

Informative intervention

Reconnect and review

Re-measure functional outcomes, participant experience, cognitive evidence, agency and sustainability separately, then continue, adapt, stop or reopen the model.

Outcome + re-check

Two connected surfaces

Institution-level intelligence without taking ownership of the person.

CSI should present different information to participants and institutional decision-makers. The purpose is to make both the system and the person more capable—not to create a hidden person-ranking layer.

Private or permissioned

PARTICIPANT SURFACE

Understand, develop and influence the conditions of participation.

A participant-facing surface can explain current evidence, preserve personal development records, accept pressure-point submissions and make review or correction routes visible.

  • See what is measured, inferred and still uncertain
  • Correct evidence and challenge a material interpretation
  • Set private mastery or development goals
  • Choose what personal evidence is shared and for what purpose
Aggregate-first

INSTITUTIONAL SURFACE

See system pressure, leading explanations and the next test.

Authorised decision-makers see appropriately aggregated workflow, pathway, cohort or programme patterns, with provenance, confidence and clear permitted-use boundaries.

  • Activity-system pressure rather than person weakness scores
  • Capacity, coupling, niche and mixed hypotheses
  • Bounded intervention and review history
  • No default individual ranking or automated consequential use

Personal cognitive capital remains person-owned. Institutions may learn from appropriately aggregated intervention evidence without acquiring unrestricted personal cognitive profiles.

Cognitive agency as an outcome

Improvement should expand the person’s capacity to understand, contest, shape and develop.

01

Epistemic agency

Understand whether difficulty is better explained by capacity, coupling, system conditions or interaction.

02

Voice and work-design agency

Raise a pressure point, choose an appropriate route and participate in the design of a bounded test.

03

Mastery and progression

Build portable capability through transparent learning demands, applied missions and participant-controlled evidence.

04

Human–AI agency

Retain model ownership, provenance, verification rights, human review and a viable unaided capability.

See the organisational and educational application →

Beyond repetition

Training should survive change.

IQ Mindware is designed to ask more than “did you improve on the exercise you practised?” Development is one possible CSI response, not the answer to every system problem.

Change the format

Recover the same underlying operation when the format, point of view or context changes.

Return later

Check whether performance can be regained after time away from the task.

Check the applied outcome

Measure a defined work, learning, service, research or performance outcome separately from app performance.

Architecture and status

One measurement layer. Three targeted coaches.

G Track and Cognitive Control Coach are available now. Pattern & Prediction Coach and Applied Reasoning Coach extend the route to structured prediction and applied judgement. These tools are selected only where the constraint model supports their use.

Explore the apps
  1. 01G Track + Zone CheckMeasure
  2. 02Cognitive Control CoachTrain
  3. 03Pattern & Prediction CoachIn development
  4. 04Applied Reasoning CoachIn development
FOR READERS WHO WANT THE SCIENTIFIC MODELExplore the full cognitive-stack framework

The detailed model maps recurring control problems—signal, evidence, predictive calibration and commitment—across attention, structured memory, prediction and reasoning. CSI locates those operations inside the wider person–policy–AI–niche system.

Detailed IQ Mindware cognitive-stack framework showing recurring control problems across attention, working memory, prediction and reasoning.
Scientific model—not product status. On a phone, swipe across the diagram.Open full size →

Find a suitable starting route.

Start with an individual development goal or one bounded organisational or institutional pressure point.

Find my route